Manoj and Others v. Sub Inspector of Police & Another
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN THURSDAY, THE 11TH JUNE 2009 / 21ST JYAISHTA 1931
Bail Appl..No. 2876 of 2009() ----------------------------(CRIME NUMBER NOT KNOWN-PALAKKAD DT.)
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.ANIL
RESPONDENT(S): COMPLAINANT/STATE
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.S.BREEZ
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/06/2009, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K.T.SANKARAN, J.
B.A.No.2876 of 2009
Dated this the 11th day of June, 2009
ORDER
The learned public prosecutor submits that no crime has been registered against the petitioners, though a petition filed by the wife of the first petitioner was received by the police. It is also submitted by the learned public prosecutor that the police do not want to arrest the petitioners in connection with the allegation made against the petitioners. This submission is recorded.
Accordingly, the Bail Application is closed with liberty to approach the court again, if and when occasion arises.
K.T.SANKARAN, JUDGE
csl
MANOJ
REMA KOMALM
GOPIKRISHNAN
BINDU
STATE
K.T.SANKARAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court