Karshakavedi v. District Registrar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court rejected the writ petition filed by Karshakavedi under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, finding no public interest in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH
FRIDAY, THE 4TH JANUARY 2008 / 14TH POUSHA 1929
WP(C).No. 538 of 2008(S)
PETITIONER:
KARSHAKAVEDI, REG. NO.K 477/97, TOMS CHAMBERS, PALA-686575, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, K.O.JOSEPH.
BY ADV. SRI.JOSEPH SEBASTIAN PURAYIDAM SMT.MABLE.C.KURIAN
RESPONDENTS:
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SHRI M.P. SREEKRISHNAN.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/01/2008,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
H.L. DATTU, CJ. & K. M. JOSEPH, J.
-------------------------------------------------W.P.C. NO. 538 OF 2008 S
Dated this the 4th January, 2007
JUDGMENT
H.L. DATTU, C.J:
We do not find any public interest in this Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, the Writ Petition requires to be rejected and it is rejected.
Ordered accordingly.
H.L. DATTU, CHIEF JUSTICE
K.M. JOSEPH, JUDGE
kbk.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Karshakavedi
District Registrar (General) Kottayam
State of Kerala
H.L. Dattu
K.M. Joseph
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court