Sivarajan v. Sindhu
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed the application (IA 2305/05) filed by the petitioner to restore the matter, directing the restoration of the application to set aside the ex parte decree upon payment of costs, thereby ensuring procedural justice despite procedural lapses.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is disposed of; IA 2305/05 is allowed; court below to restore IA 10246/03 if costs of Rs. 1,000 are paid within one month.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN
MONDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 15TH MAGHA 1929
WP(C).No. 5180 of 2007(N) ------------------------OS.1229/1999 of II ADDL.M.C.,TRIVANDRUM .................... PETITIONER:
----------------------
SIVARAJAN,S/O.PUSHKARAN,RESIDING AT PADMAVILASATHU VEEDU,THIUVALLAM VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. ( D I E D).
*ADDL.PETITIONERS 2 TO 4 ARE IMPLEADED:
P2. BHAMINI SIVARAJAN, W/O.LATE SIVARAJAN, MINI LAND HOUSE, T.R.A.E.122, S.N.NAGAR, THURUVICKAL P.O., ULLOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
P3. PARVATHY JOSHY, MINI LAND HOUSE, T.R.A.E. 122, S.N.NAGAR, THURUVICKAL P.O., ULLOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
P4. SIVASANKAR B.S., MINI LAND HOUSE, T.R.A.E.122, S.N.NAGAR, THURUVICKAL P.O., ULLOOR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application to set aside the ex parte decree in O.S. 1229/99 should be allowed in the given facts.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SIVARAJAN S/O.PUSHKARAN AND OTHERS
- respondent
SINDHU
Coram
M.N.KRISHNAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court