Disposed
Latha v. Vadakkanchery Grama Panchayat
Kerala HCWP(C)/3934/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
TUESDAY, THE 4TH MARCH 2008 / 14TH PHALGUNA 1929
WP(C).No. 3934 of 2008(R)
PETITIONER: ------------
LATHA, W/O.GOPINATH, AGED 45 YEARS UNDIKKAL HOUSE, ENGAKKAD, THRISSUR DT.
BY ADV. SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN SMT.P.A.ANITHA
RESPONDENTS:
VADAKKANCHERY GRAMA PANCHAYAT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY O/O. VADAKKANCHERY PANCHAYATH VADAKKANCHERY, THRISSUR DT.
BY ADV. SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/03/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE, J.
W.P.(c).No.3934 OF 2008
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the Panchayat seeks time to file a counter affidavit. Sri.Ranjith Thamban , counsel for the petitioner submits that Panchayat is refusing to number the first floor portion of the building on the ground of alleged violation of Section 220(b). According to him, ground floor portion was numbered without any diffidence by the Panchayat and Ext.P1 ownership certificate has been issued. If it is true that the ground floor portion of the building has been numbered by the Panchayat without any objection in the context of Section 220(b) of the Panchayat Raj Act or in any other context, there cannot be any justifiable reason for the Panchayat refusing to number the first floor portion which is constructed on the ground floor portion.
I dispose of the writ petition directing the respondent Panchayat to take a decision immediately on the petitioner's request for numbering of the building and communicate that decision to the petitioner without
WPC.No.3934/08
2
delay. Decision as directed above shall be taken and communicated to
the petitioner within three weeks of receiving a copy of this judgment.
PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE JUDGE
sv.
WPC.No.3934/08 2
LATHA, W/O.GOPINATH
VADAKKANCHERY GRAMA PANCHAYAT
PIUS C KURIAKOSE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court