The Supreme Court allowed a review application and recalled a judgment delivered on admission, directing further probing of the grounds raised in the writ petition.
Allowed the review petition and recalled the judgment dated 02.01.2008 for further consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE MONDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 15TH MAGHA 1929 RP.No. 130 of 2008(A) --------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.219/2008 Dated 02/01/2008
PETITIONER IN OP:
MINI P.O., KUNNAMANGALAM.
BY ADV. SRI.V.K.MOHAMMED YOUSUF
RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS;
BY G.P.SRI.K.J.MUHAMMED ANZAR
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J.
R.P.NO. 130 of 2008 in W.P.(C) 219 of 2008
Dated this the 3rd day of March , 2008
O R D E R
Sri.V.K.Mohammed Yousuf, the learned counsel for the petitioners has addressed me at some length on the grounds raised in the writ petition. Prima facie, I notice merits and I am of the view that the grounds require to be probed further since
my judgment was delivered at the admission stage itself.
Allowing the Review Petition, I recall my judgment dated 2.1.2008.
PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE.
dpk
U.C.Raman and others
Secretary, Kunnamangalam Grama Panchayath and others
Pius C. Kuria Jose
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
