Mathai E.V v. Roy
Case brief
What is this about?
The court disposed of a writ petition challenging a stop order on a quarry by directing the Municipal Corporation to decide the petitioner's licence application within six weeks, keeping interim protection in force.
What did the court decide?
Dir. Respondent to decide Ext.P8 application within six weeks. Interim order dated 21.1.2008 stands till final decision.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
MONDAY, THE 25TH AUGUST 2008 / 3RD BHADRA 1930
WP(C).No. 19056 of 2007(R)
---------------------------------------PETITIONER:
--------------------MATHAI E.V., S/O.UTHUPPU, AGED 69 YEARS, EDAPPARA HOUSE, EDAPPALAM P.O., PATTIKKADU, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.JIJO PAUL
RESPONDENTS:
- ------------------------1. ROY, S/O.CHANDY, PARAPPURAM HOUSE, KOTTALLA P.O., OLLUKKARA VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
2. THE JOINT CHIEF CONTROLLER OF EXPLOSIVES, SOUTH CIRCLE, CHENNAI, 140, MARSHALLS ROAD, EGMORE, CHENNAI - 600 008.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Thirssur Municipal Corporation should be directed to pass orders on the petitioner's application for an operating licence.
Whether the interim order permitting quarry operations should remain in force until the licence application is decided.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MATHAI E.V.
- respondent
THE THRISSUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Coram
ANTONY DOMINIC
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court