Dismissed
Shazna v. T.P.Senkumar
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/1062/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
FRIDAY, THE 22ND AUGUST 2008 / 31ST SRAVANA 1930
Con.Case(C).No. 1062 of 2008(S) ------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.33352/2007 Dated 13/11/2007 ....................
PETITIONER
SHAZNA (MINOR) REPRESENTED BY NEXT FRIEND AND GUARDIAN MOTHER SHAHIDA @ SHAMY, MADATHUMMURIYIL NEAR PUNNAMTHANAM GOVT.L.P.SCHOOL, VELLAVOOR POST, KOTTAYAM.
BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K) SRI.AJEESH K.SASI
RESPONDENT
T.P.SEN KUMAR, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.PRABHAKARAN, MANAGING DIRECTOR, K.S.R.T.C, TRIVANDRUM.
BY SC SRI. JOHNSON P JOHN
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22/08/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC, J
Cont. Case.No.1062/2008
Dated this the 22nd day of August, 2008
JUDGMENT
The writ petition was disposed of directing that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal be paid. It is submitted that the respondent has satisfied the award. But the counsel for the petitioner disputes on the quantum which cannot be gone into in this proceedings. It is clarified that if she has any dispute on the quantum, it is open to her
to agitate the same in appropriate proceedings. Closed.
ANTONY DOMINIC JUDGE
vi.
2
SHAZNA (MINOR) REPRESENTED BY SHAHIDA @ SHAMY
T.P.SEN KUMAR
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court