Remani v. Vironi
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed the second appeal for default due to the absence of representation by the appellant and non-service of certain respondents.
What did the court decide?
The Second Appeal is dismissed for default.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN
MONDAY, THE 4TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 15TH MAGHA 1929
SA.No. 1008 of 1996(C)
---------------------- ( AS.93/1992 of PRINCIPAL SUB COURT,ERNAKULAM OS.48/1985 of II ADDL.MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKU LAM)
APPELLANTS/1ST RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
REMANI, W/O. MOHANAN, PAZHOORPARAMBIL ILLOM, POONITHURA DESOM, NADAMA VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK.
BY REMANI (PARTY)
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS AND RESPONDENT NOS. 2 AND 3/DEFENDANTS:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
REMANI
- respondent
VERONI
- respondent
PAILY
- respondent
KUNJAMMA
- respondent
ANTONY
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court