Dismissed

Ponnamma v. C.Rajagopalan Nair

Kerala HC5 Feb 2008RP/147/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Review petition challenging a contempt order. Petitioner sought reconsideration of an employment assistance application. Court directed respondents to consider the application and call for particulars before final disposal, dismissing the review petition on merit but granting some relief.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider the employment assistance application and call for particulars before final disposal.

Ponnamma Vs C.Rajagopalan Nair — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2008)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 5TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 16TH MAGHA 1929

¶5

RP.No. 147 of 2008(S)

¶6

¶7

AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN COC.1798/2007 IN WP(C) NO.12659/2007

¶8

REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER

¶9

¶10

PONNAMMA, W/O. KALIDASAN, AGED 52 YEARS,

¶11

RAMAMANGALATHU VEEDU, DESINGANADU NAGAR-114,

¶12

ASRAMAM, KAMBIKKAKOM P.O., KOLLAM-2.

¶13

BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN

¶14

RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS

¶15

¶16

C.RAJAGOPALAN NAIR, (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), SECRETARY, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANDANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶17

D.SACHIDANANDAN,

¶18

(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), THE COMMISSIONER, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, NANDANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

¶19

BY ADV. SRI.D.SOMASUNDARAM -SC ADV.SRI.D.SREEKUMAR

¶20

THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION

¶21

ON 05/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶22

THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.

¶23

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Review Petition No.147 of 2008 in Contempt of Court Case No.1798 of 2007-S in W.P.(C) No. 12659 of 2007-F

¶24

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

¶25

Dated this the 5^th day of February, 2008 O R D E R

¶26

Adv.D.Sreekumar appears for the respondents.

¶27

This review petition does not really disclose any ground for

¶28

review of the order passed on the contempt of court case. However, it is urged by the review petitioner that she had made an application in the proper format, for employment assistance, and to say so she has placed Annexure A1 on record. Under such circumstances, the Commissioner, Travancore Devaswom Board and Secretary, Travancore Devaswom Board, will make an endevour to consider Annexure A1 and also call for any particulars or papers as may be required from the petitioner to finally dispose of the matter.

¶29

Review petition is disposed of as above.

¶30

THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, Judge

¶31

Ponnamma v. C.Rajagopalan Nair

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ponnamma v. C.Rajagopalan Nair

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V.N.Gopalakrishnan Nair Vs Joint Registrar of Co-Operative Societie

George Thomas Vs President,Puthuyppally Village Service

South India Corporation Ltd. Vs Addl.Commissioner of Income Tax

Benny Jose Vs Returning Officer,Paraspara Sahaya Co-Op

P.M.Mathew Vs Kadavoor Scb Ltd.

V.Natarajan Vs Joint Registrar of Co-Op.Societies & Ors.