Vinod.v.S. v. Special Thahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court allowed a review petition dismissing an earlier judgment, holding that land acquisition proceedings lapsed because the Section 6(1) declaration was not issued within the statutory time limit.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition allowed; entire land acquisition proceedings declared to have lapsed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR
TUESDAY, THE 4TH APRIL 2008 / 15TH CHAITHRA, 1930
RP.No. 1215 of 2007(T)
---------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.12979/2006 Dated 30/03/2007
REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS 2 TO 5&7(1ST PETITIONER DIED AFTER THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND HER LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES ARE PETITIONERS 2 AND 3
- VINOD V.S.,
V.S. HOUSE, PALACE NAGAR, 110, KAZHAKKOOTTAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
- SHEETHAL V.S.,
V.S. HOUSE, PALACE NAGAR, 110, KAZHAKKOOTTAM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the land acquisition proceedings lapsed due to failure to issue Section 6(1) declaration within the statutory period.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vinod V.S.
- petitioner
Sheethal V.S.
- petitioner
P. Jaya
- petitioner
N. Somadas
- petitioner
Indira Vijayan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court