C.K.Jeevandas v. Arun
Case brief
What is this about?
All parties admitted an out-of-court settlement. The appellant purchased rights of other respondents. The court allowed the appeal, set aside the trial court's decree, and refunded half the court fee based on the compromise terms.
What did the court decide?
The decree of the trial court is set aside. The terms of compromise form part of the appellate decree. One-half of the court fee paid will be refunded to the appellant.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR
FRIDAY, THE 4TH APRIL 2008 / 15TH CHAITHRA 1930
RFA.No. 536 of 2006()
(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS.NO.264/1995 DATED 19.11.2005) & A.S.NO.247/2006 BEFORE THE III DISTRICT COURT, ERNAKULAM)
APPELLANT/7TH DEFENDANT:
C.K. JEEVANDAS,
S/O. CHAKKUMKAL KUNJAN, AGED ABOUT 70, ADVOCATE, RESIDING AT XL/7856-A, 1ST FLOOR, M.G.ROAD, KOCHI-35.
BY ADV. SRI.S.RAMESH BABU
RESPONDENTS: PLAINTIFF/DEFENDANTS 1 TO 6:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be allowed in light of the out-of-court settlement and compromise filed between the appellant and the first respondent.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
C.K. Jeevandas
- respondent
Arun
- respondent
Indira Amma
- respondent
Ashadevi
- respondent
Madhusudhanan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court