S.Geetha v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners filed a writ petition alleging grievance against the prescription of qualifications for promotion. The court directed the respondents to implement AICTE clauses within four months of the judgment.
What did the court decide?
To take steps for implementing AICTE qualification norms within four months of the date of the judgment.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
FRIDAY, THE 23RD MAY 2008 / 2ND JYAISHTA 1930
OP.No. 4694 of 2000(H)
PETITIONER:
-----------1.S.GEETHA, LECTURER IN ELECTRONICS, GOVT.POLYTECHNIC, NEYYATTINKARA.
2.MAJU S.SIMON, LECTURER IN ELECTRONICS, GOVT.POLYTECHNIC, NEYYATTINKARA.
3.T.R.ALEX SOBHANA RAJKUMAR, LECTURER, ELECTRONICS, GOVERNMENT WOMEN'S POLYTECHNIC, KAIMANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
4.SHIBU R.S., LECTURER, ELECTRONICS, GOVERNMENT POLYTECHNIC, NEYYATTINKARA.
5.BEENA M.S., LECTURER, ELECTRONICS, GOVERNMENT POLYTECHNIC, NEYYATTINKARA.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents' delay in implementing the AICTE qualification norms warrants relief in the writ petition?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.GEETHA and others
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA and others
Coram
KURIAN JOSEPH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court