M.v.Noushad v. Hairunnisa
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed a matrimonial appeal and an application for condoning a delay in filing the appeal upon submission that the dispute between parties was settled out of court.
What did the court decide?
Discharge of the matrimonial appeal and the application for condonation of delay.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 24TH MAGHA 1929
Mat.Appeal.No. 108 of 2003() ---------------------------OP.266/2001 of FAMILY COURT,KOZHIKODE ....................
PETITIONER: APPELLANT/RESPONDENT
-------------------------------M.V.NOUSHAD, 28 YEARS S/O. BAPPUTTY, K.M.A. NAGAR, CHERIYA MANKAVU, THIRUVANNUR P.O., KOZHIKODE TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.P.S.SREEDHARAN PILLAI
RESPONDENTS: PETITIONER ----------------------HAIRUNNISA C.M., 20 YEARS, D/O. ABOOBACKER, CHEMBATTA MALAYIL HOUSE, KARUVAMPOYIL P.O., KODUVALLY VILLAGE, KODUVALLY AMSOM, KARUVAMPOYIL DESOM, KOZHIKODE TALUK.
BY
THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
KURIAN JOSEPH & HARUN-UL-RASHID, JJ.
Mat.Appeal No.108 of 2003 & C.M.Appln.No.878 of 2003
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.V.NOUSHAD
- respondent
HAIRUNNISA C.M.
Coram
KURIAN JOSEPH
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court