Chacko v. Shaji
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition challenging the dismissal of an interim injunction application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 CPC. The court held that no revision is maintainable against such orders.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed for default in curing procedural defects.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 1ST PHALGUNA 1929
CRP.No. 830 of 2005
---------------------
( CMA.9/2005 of ADDL. DISTRICT COURT, N. PARAVUR I.A.NO. 1887 OF 2004 IN O.S.450/2004 of MUNSIFF COURT,ALUVA )
REVN. PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS/PLAINTIFFS:
- CHACKO, AGED 61, S/O.KURIAN, VATTAKOTTAYIL HOUSE, KANNIMANGALAM KARA MALAYATTOOR VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK.
- WILSON, AGED 32, S/O. CHACKO, -DO- -DO-.
BY ADV. SRI.K.SREESAKUMAR
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a civil revision is maintainable against an order under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of the CPC even if confirmed in appeal?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
CHACKO
- petitioner
WILSON
- respondent
SHAJI
- respondent
P.P. SEBASTIAN
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court