This is a contempt of court case. The petitioner submitted that an earlier order had been complied with, albeit delayed. The respondent did not dispute this. The court closed the contempt proceedings on these submissions.
The contempt case was closed as the petitioner submitted that the order had been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN
MONDAY, THE 18TH FEBRUARY 2008 / 29TH MAGHA 1929
Con.Case(C).No. 1704 of 2007(S)
THE JUDGEMENT IN WP(C) NO..30725/2006 Dated 18/12/2006
PETITIONER/IST PETITIONER
C.EAPPEN, S/O.LATE KOSHY, AGED 70 YEARS, KALLIYIL PUTHEN VEEDU, CHERIKONAM, THRIKKOVILVATTOM VILLAGE, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.PRATHEESH.P
RESPONDENT: 3RD RESPONDENT
UNNIKRISHNA PILLAI, THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LA), K.I.P.II, KOTTIYAM, KOLLAM.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.S.DILEEP
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 18/02/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K.T.SANKARAN, J.
Contempt case (C) NO. 1704 OF 2007 -----------------------------------------------------Dated this the 18th February, 2008
JUDGMENT
It is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that the order has been complied with though not within time. In view of the submission, which is not disputed by the other side, the Contempt of Court Case is closed.
(K.T.SANKARAN) Judge
ahz/
K.T.SANKARAN, J.
------------------------------------------Cont. Case (C) NO. 1704 OF 2007
JUDGMENT
18th February, 2008
C.EAPPEN
UNNIKRISHNA PILLAI
K.T.SANKARAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
