Both these revision petitions are preferred against the award of the First Additional District Judge, Kollam in OP(Electricity) 50/98. CRP 791/07 is preferred by the revision petitioner/ petitioner and CRP 809/07 is preferred by the revision petitioner/respondent. It is seen that the revision petitioner/ petitioner in the case is the owner of 55 cents of land comprised in Sy. No.2531/3 of the Pattazhi Village, which she had obtained in the year 1996. The Power Grid Corporation initially found that 73 rubber trees, which were cut and removed, were not yielding trees and awarded only a compensation of Rs.12,500/- for the same. It also found that there were 24 other rubber trees of which 15 were yielding and the other were not yielding and therefore awarded a compensation of Rs.16,023.20/-. However, no compensation was granted for diminution of land value by the Power Grid Corporation. It was dissatisfied with that, evidence was adduced. The court found that there was an attempt on the part of the respondent regarding the yielding of 73 trees cut and removed. The lower court has extracted “it is also stated in
