K.S.E.B v. Sri.Ouseph
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed the CM application and revised petition due to uncondonable delay of 794 days in filing the petition without any explanation.
What did the court decide?
CM application dismissed; revision petition dismissed as barred by limitation.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.P.BALACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 9TH DECEMBER 2008 / 18TH AGRAHAYANA 1930
CRP.No. 695 of 2007 --------------------------------OPELE.127/2001 of ADL.D.C., THODUPUZHA ....................
REVN. PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB
RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: SRI.OUSEPH, S/O THOMMAN, PAZHEDATHU HOUSE, ANAKKAYAM PO., ANCHIRI.
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K.P. Balachandran, J.
C.M.Appl.No.801 of 2007 & C.R.P.No.695 of 2007
ORDER
Respondent though served, has not entered
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay of 794 days in filing the revision petition should be condoned.
Whether the revision petition is barred by limitation.
Parties & counsel
- respondent
Kerala State Electricity Board
- petitioner
Sri. Ouseph
Coram
K.P. Balachandran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court