Suniya v. T.P.Senkumar I.P.S
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt case wherein the petitioner's counsel confirmed the impugned judgment was complied with, leading the court to close the matter.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2008 / 19TH CHAITHRA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 596 of 2008(S) -----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.33542/2007 Dated 14/11/2007 ....................
PETITIONER:PETITIONER:
-----------------------------------------
SUNIYA, AGED 36 YEARS, W/O.PRABHAKARAN NAIR,PRASANTH BHAVANAM, EDAVATTOM CHERRY, CHIRAKKARA VILLAGE, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.PRATHEESH.P
RESPONDENT:
------------------------
T.P.SENKUMAR I.P.S., (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY SRI.JOHNSON P.JOHN, SC, KSRTC
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SUNIYA
- respondent
T.P.SENKUMAR I.P.S.
Coram
ANTONY DOMINIC
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court