In this contempt of court case, the court observed that the petitioner's course of action was to challenge a specific order dated 15/1/2008. Consequently, the contempt proceedings were closed without prejudice to the petitioner's rights.
The contempt case is closed without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner to challenge the order dated 15/1/2008.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
TUESDAY, THE 8TH APRIL 2008 / 19TH CHAITHRA 1930
Con.Case(C).No. 510 of 2008(S) -----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.955/2008 Dated 08/01/2008
PETITIONER/ 1ST PETITIONER IN THE WRIT PETITION:-
------------------------------------------------------------------
SAKKIR HUSSAIN, AGED 39 YEARS, S/O.KUNJIKKOCHU, MAMMANAYATHUKUDY HOUSE, VADAKKUMBHAGAM VILLAGE, ALUVA TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.SIRAJ KAROLY
RESPONDENT: 4TH RESPONDENT IN THE WRIT PETITION:-
--------------------------------------------------------------------
M.K.JOSEPH, AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, FORT KOCHI, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, FORT KOCHI.
BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.I.V.PRAMOD
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08/04/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
===============
Cont.Case.(C) NO. 510 OF 2008 S =====================
Dated this the 8th day of April, 2008
J U D G M E N T
The direction in the judgment was to consider Ext.P6 representation
made by the petitioner.
Now that order has been passed as mentioned above, the Contempt of Court Case is closed without prejudice to the rights of the petitioner.
ANTONY DOMINIC,JUDGE.
Rp
SAKKIR HUSSAIN
M.K.JOSEPH
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
