Jibi Thomas v. Mini Antony
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a contempt proceeding where the respondent counsel submitted that a permit would be issued within two weeks as directed. The court recorded the submission and discharged the petitioner with liberty to move again after three weeks if necessary.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner discharged with liberty to move again in three weeks.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
MONDAY, THE 24TH MARCH 2008 / 4TH CHAITHRA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 443 of 2008(S) -----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.23461/2007 Dated 07/09/2007 ....................
PETITIONER
- JIBI THOMAS @ GEORGE THOMAS,AGED 39 S/O.DAVIS THOMAS, GALLILA, PIPE LINE ROAD PALARIVATTOM, COCHIN -25
- DEEPA GEORGE, AGED 32 W/O. GEORGE THOMAS,GALLILA, PIPE LINE ROAD PALARIVATTOM, COCHIN -25
BY ADV. SRI.BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
SRI.NAVEEN SHERRY LUKOSE
RESPONDENTS:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Jibi Thomas @ George Thomas and Deepa George
- respondent
Mrs. Mini Antony and Mr. K.S. Subash
Coram
Pius C. Kuria
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court