Sakeer Hussain v. Manoj Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala, in a contempt of court case, held that a contempt petition need no longer be taken cognizance of after a compromise in the underlying proceedings, and accordingly dropped the petition while reserving liberty.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition dropped; liberty reserved.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.H.L.DATTU & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN
FRIDAY, THE 14TH MARCH 2008 / 24TH PHALGUNA 1929
Con.Case(C).No. 316 of 2008(S)
NON-COMPLIANCE OF THE ORDER DATED 13.12.2007 IN CRL.MP.3403/2007 OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE I, PERAMBRA
PETITIONER:PETITIONER:
SAKEER HUSSAIN, S/O.MOIDEEN KOYA, AGED 24 YEARS, RAHATH MANZIL, THRIVANGOOR AMSOM DESOM, KOZHIKODE.
BY ADV. SRI.P.NARAYANAN
RESPONDENT:
MANOJ KUMAR, AGED 28 YEARS, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERAMBRA POLICE STATION, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SAKEER HUSSAIN
- respondent
MANOJ KUMAR
Coram
H.L.DATTU
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court