Tomy v. Sukumary.S.K.
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt case was finally heard where the respondent submitted that the prior judgment had been complied with. The court recorded this submission and closed the case without delivering a separate detailed judgment.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case was closed. No further relief was granted.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
THURSDAY, THE 27TH MARCH 2008 / 7TH CHAITHRA 1930
Con.Case(C).No. 180 of 2008(S)
-----------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.37705/2007 Dated 19/12/2007
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS
----------------------
1. TOMY, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.ABRAHAM, NEDUMKANDATHIL HOUSE, WARD NO.3, KOOVAPPADY PANCHAYATH, KUNNATHUNAD TALUK.
2. XAVIER, AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.OUSEPH, MATTEKKADAN HOUSE, WARD NO.3, KOOVAPPADY PANCHAYATH, KUNNATHUNAD TALUK.
3. T.R.JOHNY, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O.RAPHEL, THELAKKATTU HOUSE WARD NO.2, KOOVAPPADY PANCHAYATH, KUNNATHUNAD TALUK.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
TOMY
- petitioner
XAVIER
- petitioner
T.R.JOHNY
- respondent
SUKUMARY S.K.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court