R.Prasanna Kumar and Others v. K.K.Gangadharan,Director of Agriculture
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
FRIDAY, THE 25TH JULY 2008 / 3RD SRAVANA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1601 of 2007(S) ------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.20111/2005 Dated 30/03/2007 ....................
: PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC
AGED 35 YEARS, AGRICULTURAL ASSISTANT GRADE II, KRISHI BHAVAN, KUDAPPANAKUNNU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.M.V.THAMBAN
RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENTS IN WPC
DIRECTORATE OF AGRICULTURE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, WORKING AS SECRETARY TO GOVT., DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.ALEXANDER THOMAS,SC,KPSC FOR ADDL.R3 GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.NOBLE MATHEW..
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 25/07/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
KURIAN JOSEPH, J.
Con.Case (C) No.1601 of 2007
---------------------------------------------Dated 25th July, 2008.
J U D G M E N T
In view of the intervening developments leading to Annexure II order dated 10.7.2008, it is submitted that the Contempt of Court Case can be closed, with a direction to the Government to take steps to implement that order. Ordered accordingly and the Contempt of Court Case is closed.
KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.
tgs
KURIAN JOSEPH, J
Con.Case (C) No.1601 of 2007
J U D G M E N T
Dated 25th July, 2008.
R.PRASANNA KUMAR, S.L.SHYAMKUMAR, M.N.RAJENDRAN, S.M.RAHUL, BOBAN PAUL, NASEER T.K., SHAJI R.
SHRI. K.K.GANGADHARAN
B.VALSALAKUMARI
KURIAN JOSEPH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court