In this contempt case, the court held that the matter was not a fit case to proceed under the Contempt of Courts Act. The case was closed without prejudice to the petitioner's right to take appropriate action regarding a specific government order.
The Contempt of Court Case is closed without prejudice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.GIRI
FRIDAY, THE 17TH OCTOBER 2008 / 25TH ASWINA 1930
Con.Case(C).No. 1415 of 2008(S) ------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT IN WPC.38085/2007 Dated 01/01/2008 ....................
PETITIONER(S): ---------------
MATHEW THOMAS, AGED 49, S/O.LATE V.G. THOMAS, MACHINE OPERATOR(THIRD HG), COMMON FACILITY SERVICE CENTRE, CHANGANASSERY, INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT OF GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, RESIDING AT VECHOOKAROTTU HOUSE,VENKURINJI.P.O, MANIPUZHA,ERUMELY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.M.N.MATHEW
RESPONDENT(S): ---------------
SRI.T.BALAKRISHNAN, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
BY GP SRI.P.N.SANTHOSH
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17/10/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
V.GIRI, J
Cont.Case (C).1415/2008
Dated this the 17th day of October, 2008
JUDGMENT
Having heard learned counsel on either side and having perused Annexure-II Government Order, I am of the view that this is not a fit case to proceed under the Contempt of Courts Act. C.O.C is accordingly closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to take appropriate action in relation to Annexure-II.
V.GIRI, Judge
mrcs
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present matter is a fit case to proceed under the Contempt of Courts Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MATHEW THOMAS
SRI.T.BALAKRISHNAN
V. GIRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
