M.a,Abdul Haris v. Mathew Joseph
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt proceeding, the petitioner challenged non-compliance with an earlier judgment. Counsel for the respondent produced an order dated 28.8.2008 passed by the Panchayat claiming compliance. The court held that leaving open the petitioner's remedy against that order, the contempt petition is closed.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition is closed allowing petitioner to pursue remedy against the Panchayat order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC TUESDAY, THE 16TH DECEMBER 2008 / 25TH AGRAHAYANA 1930 Con.Case(C).No. 1330 of 2008(S) ------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.20510/2008 Dated 08/07/2008 ....................
PETITIONER(S): PETITIONER/PETITIONER -----------------------------------M.A.HARIS, S/O. M.A.MOHAMMED KUNHI HAJI, AGED 46 YEARS, GOVT. CONTRACTOR, MUNNAMBATH HOUSE, CHENGALA P.O., KASARAGOD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA SRI.K.I.SAGEER
RESPONDENT(S): ---------------
MATHEW JOSEPH, AGED 52 YEARS, JOSEPH, WORKING AS SECRETARY, KUNNUMMAL BLOCK PANCHAYAT, KUNNUMMAL P.O. VATTOLI - VIA, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT
ADV. SRI.C.R.SIVAKUMAR FOR R1
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/12/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC,J. -------------------------
COC. No.1330/2008
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt proceeding should be closed upon presentation of an order by the Panchayat complying with the initial judgment.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.A.HARIS
- respondent
MATHEW JOSEPH
Coram
ANTONY DOMINIC
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court