An appeal which was finally heard on 15/01/2008 was dismissed as it had been settled out of court and the appellant expressed lack of interest in prosecuting it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.PADMANABHAN NAIR
TUESDAY, THE 15TH JANUARY 2008 / 25TH POUSHA 1929
AS.No. 801 of 1994()
-------------------OS.122/1992 of ADDL.SUB COURT, ALAPPUZHA
APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
M.K.OMANAKUTTAN NAIR, FAIRFEEL AGENCIES, THAKAZHY, ALLEPPEY DISTRICT, THROUGH HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI, PADINJARAEMUTTASSERY, PADAHARAM, THAKAZHY.
BY ADV. SMT.BINDU.C.G.
RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:
TOMY VARGHEESE, TOM ENTERPRISES, COLD STORAGE, PICTHU IYYER JUNCTION, ALLEPPEY.
BY ADV. SRI.SREELAL N.WARRIAR,MATHEW JOHN SRI.SUNIL S.RAJ
THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15/01/2008, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
K. PADMANABHAN NAIR ,J.
A.S.No.801 of 1994
Dated, this the 15th day of January, 2008 JUDGMENT
When the matter is taken up for curing the defects, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter is settled out of court and the appellant is not
interested to prosecute the appeal.
In the result, the appeal is dismissed as settled out of court.
K. PADMANABHAN NAIR, JUDGE.
cks
2
K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, J.
A.S.No.801 of 1994
JUDGMENT
15th January, 2008.
M.K. OMANAKUTTAN NAIR, FAIRFEEL AGENCIES
TOMY VARGHEESE, TOM ENTERPRISES
K. Padmanabhan Nair
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
