Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Vinod Vs Adichanalloor Grama Panchayat — Service and Employment | Kerala HC (2007)

Home
Kerala HC
2007
Vinod Vs Adichanalloor Grama PanchayatVinod v. Adichanalloor Grama Panchayat

Vinod v. Adichanalloor Grama Panchayat

Kerala HC7 Mar 2007WP(C)/7579/2007

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…

What the court decided

AI extract

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner should be permitted to submit a proper representation before the Panchayat after the proposal was rejected.

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE

WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH MARCH 2007 / 16TH PHALGUNA 1928

WP(C).No. 7579 of 2007(B)

PETITIONER: ------------

VINOD, S/O.CHELLAPPAN, VISHNU VIHAR, THAZHUTHALA, KOTTIYAM P.O., KOLLAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.P.A.NOOR MUHAMMED SRI.C.K.PRASAD SRI.T.K.KUNJUMON

RESPONDENTS:

ADICHANALLOOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

MASS CABLE VISION, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, MYLAKKAD, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

Issues for consideration

1 issue framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the petitioner should be permitted to submit a proper representation before the Panchayat after the proposal was rejected.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Vinod
respondent
Adichanalloor Grama Panchayath
respondent
Mass Cable Vision

Coram

AI extract

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Kerala HC
Decided on: 7 Mar 2007 · March
Registered: 6 Mar 2007
Case no.: WP(C)/7579/2007

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Pius C.kuriakose

Keezhmad Grama Panchayath Vs G.Viswanadhankutty
6 Mar 2007
N.Rajasekharan Nair Vs the Corporation of Thiruvananthapuram
6 Mar 2007
M.a.Alexander Vs the Supdt of Police
6 Mar 2007
R.Chandra Babu Vs Punalur Municipality Rep. by Its Secty.
7 Mar 2007

Cite this judgement

Vinod v. Adichanalloor Grama Panchayat, WP(C)/7579/2007 (KL), decided on 7 March 2007.

The High Court of Kerala publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Pius C. KuriaKose

Parties & counsel

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07/03/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J.

W.P.(C) No.7579 OF 2007

........................................................... DATED THIS THE 7TH MARCH, 2007

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner submitted Ext.P2 terms and conditions which he describes as an application for permission to draw cables through Panchayat roads. He submits that his proposal was not accepted by the Panchayat which in turn granted permission to the 2^nd respondent for drawal of cables through roads. The action of the Panchayat, he now contends, is violative of Section 220(a) of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.

I do not propose to go into the merits of the matter. The petitioner is permitted to submit a proper representation before the Panchayat in continuation of Ext.P2, arraying the 2^nd respondent also as a party. If the Panchayat receives such a representation within one week of the petitioner receiving copy of this judgment, the Panchayat will consider that representation with notice to the petitioner and the 2^nd respondent and take a decision. Decision as directed above will be taken by the Panchayat within two weeks of receiving the representation.

(PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE)

tgl

WP(C)N0.7579 OF 2007

-2-

Pius C. KuriaKose

CNR

KLHC010462492007

Topic

Service and Employment

Bench

Pius C.kuriakose

Disposal

DISPOSED OF

C.v.Velayudhan Vs the Managing Director, K.S.R.T.C.

7 Mar 2007

Kuruvila Kora.v Vs the Manarcadu Grama Panchayat & Another

7 Mar 2007