Disposed
V.V. Shaji v. Thiruvalla Municipality
Kerala HCWP(C)/6669/2007
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE MONDAY, THE 9TH APRIL 2007 / 19TH CHAITHRA 1929
WP(C).No. 6669 of 2007(R)
PETITIONER:
BY ADV. SRI.K.RAMACHANDRAN SMT.R.MEERA
RESPONDENTS:
THIRUVELLA MUNCIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, THIRUVALLA P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.JACOB MATHEW MANALIL SC THIRUVALLA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/04/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, J.
W.P.(C)NO.6669 of 2007
Dated this 9th day of April, 2007
JUDGMENT
Having regard to the submissions addressed at the bar by Sri.K.Ramachandran, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri.Jacob Mathew Manalil, the learned Standing Counsel respondent Municipality, this writ petition will stand disposed of relegating the petitioners to statutory remedies which are available to them. However, there will be a further order that the interim order dated 28.8.2007 will continue for a period of three more months.
Since there is some confusion regarding the nature of the order impugned, the order will be treated by all the concerned as final order for the purpose of appeal.
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE Judge
dpk
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed in favour of statutory remedies while extending an interim order.
Whether the impugned order should be treated as a final order for appeal purposes.
V.V.SHAJI
RAJUS J.
THIRUVELLA MUNCIPALITY
PIUS C. KURIAKOSE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court