The Court closed the writ petition as an interim order was passed on 14-2-2007 requiring no further orders, making that interim order absolute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR
THURSDAY, THE 22ND MARCH 2007 / 1ST CHAITHRA 1929
WP(C).No. 5103 of 2007(G)
-------------------------------------
PETITIONER:
-------------------
ST.JOSEPH CHARITABLE SOCIETY, REG.NO.K.275/73, KURUPPANTHARA, MANJOOR-686 603, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT K.J.JAMES.
BY ADV. SRI.M.A.FIROZ,
SRI.GEORGE MECHERIL.
RESPONDENTS:
------------------------
1. THE DY. COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOLLAM.
2. THE COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER, AUDIT & ASSESSMENT, OFFICE OF THE COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER, KOTTAYAM CAMP, ETTUMANOOR.
3. THE INSPECTING ASST. COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOTTAYAM.
BY SR. GOVT. PLEADER SRI. MOHAMMED RAFIQ.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22/03/2007,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C). NO.5103/2007:
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
EXT.P.1: COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE NO. KB. 5016/2001-B13 DTD. 04/10/06 ISSUED BY THE DIRECTOR, KERALA KHADI AND VILLAGE INDUSTRIES BOARD.
EXT.P.2: COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO. 17/2006/CT DTD. 19/04/2006.
EXT.P.3: COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE R.2. DTD. 26/10/2006 FOR THE YEAR 4/2005 TO 3/2006.
EXT.P.4: COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DTD. 26/10/2006 ISSUED BY THE R.2.
EXT.P.5: COPY OF THE APPEAL PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.1. DT. 04/11/12006.
EXT.P.6: COPY OF THE STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.1. DT. 04/01/2006.
EXT.P.7: COPY OF THE R.R. NOTICE NO. RRC 118/06-07 DTD. 23/01/2007 ISSUED BY THE R.3. BEFORE THE R.1.
EXT.P.8.A: COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO. TIN 320521127622/04/2006/ 26/10/2006 OF THE R.2.
EXT.P.8.B: COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO. TIN 320521127622/06/2006/26.10.2006 OF THE R.2.
EXT.P.8.C: COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO. TIN.320521127622/07/2006 26/10/2006 OF THE R.2.
EXT.P.8.D: COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER NO. TIN 320521127622/05/2006/ 26/10/2006 OF THE R.2.
EXT.P.9.A: COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DTD. 26/10/2006 FOR THE PERIOD 4/06.
EXT.P.9.B: COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DT. 26/10/2006 FOR THE PERIOD 5/06.
EXT.P.9.C: COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DT. 26/10/2006 FOR THE PERIOD 6/06.
EXT.P.9.D: COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE DT. 26/10/2006 FOR THE PERIOD 7/06.
EXT.P.10.A: COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.1. DT. 07/11/2006.
EXT.P.10.B: COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.1. DT. 07/11/2006.
W.P.(C). NO. 5103/2007:
EXT.P.10.C: COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.1. DT. 07/11/2006.
EXT.P.10.D: COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.1. DTD. 07/11/2006.
EXT.P.11.A: COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.1. DT. 07/11/2006.
EXT.P.11.B: COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE .1. DT. 07/11/2006.
EXT.P.11.C: COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.1. DT. 07/11/2006.
EXT.P.11.D: COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE R.1. DT. 07/11/2006.
EXT.P.12: COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY R.3. TO THE PETITIONER DTD. 23/01/2007.
//TRUE COPY//
prv.
K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, J.
W.P.(C).No.5103 of 2007-G
--------------------------------Dated this the 22nd day of March, 2007
JUDGMENT
In view of the interim order passed by this Court on 14-2-2007, no further orders are required in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, it is closed making the said interim order absolute.
K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR, JUDGE.
MS
ST.JOSEPH CHARITABLE SOCIETY
THE DY. COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOLLAM
THE COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER
THE INSPECTING ASST. COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, KOTTAYAM
K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
