Remesan v. Secretary, R.T.A.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought revision of his own timings. Court directed respondent to consider relevant evidence and pass final orders expeditiously after hearing the petitioner.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondent to consider Exhibit P2 and pass final orders expeditiously after hearing the petitioner.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.RAMAN
MONDAY, THE 15TH JANUARY 2007 / 25TH PAUSHA 1928
WP(C).No. 274 of 2007(G)
------------------------
PETITIONER:
--------------
P.REMESAN, S/O. PAPPU, AGED 45 YEARS, RESIDING AT COLONY NO.61, THOTTAPPALLY, ALAPPUZHA.
BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK
RESPONDENT:
---------------
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. Remesan
- respondent
The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Alappuzha
Coram
P.R. Raman
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court