The Court closed the writ petition after the Government Pleader submitted that steps were already taken to address the petitioner's grievances regarding benefits. Directed to approach the second respondent for further redress if grievances remain unresolved.
The writ petition was closed; petitioner to approach the second respondent if grievances persist.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH
WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH JULY 2007 / 27TH ASHADHA 1929
WP(C).No. 2466 of 2004(R)
----------------------------------
PETITIONER:
-------------------
KUTTAPPAN, S/O. GOVINDAN, T.C.NO.11/810, NANTHANCODE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-3.
BY ADV. SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF SMT.P.RESHMA KABIR
RESPONDENTS:
----------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE DIRECTOR, SCHEDULE CASTE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, MUSEUM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
3. THE DISTRICT OFFICER, DISTRICT SCHEDULE CASTE DEVELOPMENT OFFICE, ATTARA BUILDINGS, PAZHAVANGAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. K.V.MANOJ
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 18/07/2007,THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO: 2466/2004 R
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
EXT.P1. COPY OF THE ORDER NO. T. 8/95 DT. 18/3/95 OF THE REGIONAL TRAINING OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
EXT.P2. COPY OF THE REPORT DT. 3/3/05 OF THE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER FOR SC. EX.T.P3. COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR, SC DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
EXT.P4. COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE DIRECTOR, SC DEVELOPMENT DEPARMTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DT. 27/3/2003.
EXT.P5. COPY OF THE LIST CONTAINING THE NAME AND NUMBERS OF THE LICENCES. EXT.P6. COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DT. 10/4/03 EXECUTED BETWEEN PETITIONER AND DIST. DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
EXT.P7. COPY OF THE COMPLAINT BEFORE THE R2 FROM THE PETITIONER. EXT.P8. COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO. F7/4522/03 DT. 25/3/03 OF THE R2.
EXT.P9. COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS NO. F. 7/4522/03 DT. 27/3/03 OF THE R2.
EXT.P10. COPY OF THE RECEIPT DT. 31/3/2005 BY THE R2.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS NIL
True copy
tga
KURIAN JOSEPH, J.
---------------------------------------
W.P. (C). NO. 2466 OF 2004
Dated this the 18th day of July, 2007.
J U D G M E N T
Petitioner approached this Court with certain grievances regarding the disbursement of eligible benefits as per Exhibits P3 and P4. Learned Government Pleader submits that steps have already been taken in the matter. Therefore, this writ petition is closed making it clear that in case the petitioner has still any grievance left, he may approach the second respondent.
KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.
smp
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding grievances on disbursement of eligible benefits requires adjudication.
KUTTAPPAN
STATE OF KERALA
THE DIRECTOR, SCHEDULE CASTE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
THE DISTRICT OFFICER, DISTRICT SCHEDULE CASTE DEVELOPMENT OFFICE
KURIAN JOSEPH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
