Kumari Thankam v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition regarding a delay in considering a promotion claim from Helper to Worker in an Anganwadi, the High Court of Kerala directed the 2nd respondent to dispose of the Ext.P5 application within one month.
What did the court decide?
Directed the 2nd respondent to pass orders on Ext.P5 within one month from the date of receipt of the judgment.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.DENESAN
MONDAY, THE 26TH MARCH 2007 / 5TH CHAITHRA 1929
WP(C).No. 10310 of 2007(B)
--------------------------
PETITIONER:
--------------
KUMARI THANKAM, PUTHUVAL PUTHEN VEEDU, PEELIYAMKONAM, KULATHOOR, VAKKADAMB P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV. SRI.K.K.VIJAYAN
SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY
RESPONDENTS:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition concerning delay in considering the petitioner's promotion claim should be disposed of?
Whether the 2nd respondent is directed to pass orders on the Ext.P5 application within one month?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
KUMARI THANKAM
- respondent
THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPT., GOVT. SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
- respondent
THE DIRECTOR OF SOCIAL WELFARE DEPT., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
- respondent
THE DIST. SOCIAL WELFARE OFFICER, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
- respondent
THE PROJECT OFFICER, CHILD WELFARE PROJECT (ICDS), PARASSALA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court