The petitioner sought recovery against the respondents. The court held that as the petitioner obtained partial relief in an appeal and claimed no further relief, the original petition became infructuous and was dismissed accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
TUESDAY, THE 6TH FEBRUARY 2007 / 17TH MAGHA 1928
OP.No. 4904 of 2003(H)
PETITIONER:
K.S. RAMESH, PROPRIETOR, A.B. MARKETING, MULLASSERRY CANAL ROAD, ERNAKULAM.
BY ADV. SRI.R.MURALIDHARAN (AROOR) SRI.K.P.JOSE PIOUS
RESPONDENTS:
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER – ADV. SMT.SMITHA
THIS ORIGINAL PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/02/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
OP NO. 4904/2003
ORDER ON CMP NO.8721/2003 IN OP NO. 4904/2003
DISMISSED.
06/02/2007 SD/- (C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
// TRUE COPY //
PA TO JUDGE.
jg
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.
O.P. No. 4904 of 2003
Dated, this the 6th day of February, 2007
J U D G M E N T
Since the Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has got partial relief in the appeal and he does not claim any further relief, this O.P. has become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.
(C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.)
jg
K.S. RAMESH
ADDITIONAL SALES TAX OFFICER, 1ST CIRCLE, ERNAKULAM
INSPECTING ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM
C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
