P.Babu v. Mg.Partner
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed both the application for condonation of delay and the first appeal for non-prosecution due to insufficient grounds for the 979-day delay in filing.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.BASHEER
WEDNESDAY, THE 3RD OCTOBER 2007 / 11TH ASWINA 1929
MFA.No. 694 of 2003 -----------------------WCC.94/1996 of W.C.C.,KOLLAM
APPELLANT: APPELLANTS:
- MR.P.BABU, S/O. LATE PERUMAL, THAI ILLOM, BACK SIDE OF MURUGAN THEATRE, KAMARAJ NAZAR, MANAPPARAI, TRICHY DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU-621 306.
- SMT.PONNARUVI @ PONNU KURUVI, D/O.LATE PERUMAL, ANNA NAGAR, ALLIPATTY P.O., MANAPPARAI, TRICHY DISTRICT,TAMIL NADU-621 306.
BY ADV. SRI.P.VIJAYARAGHAVAN
RESPONDENTS: OPPOSITE PARTIES:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone a gross delay of 979 days in filing an appeal without sufficient grounds.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
MR.P.BABU
- appellant
SMT.PONNARUVI
- respondent
THE MANAGING PARTNER, M/S. BATRA BROTHERS
- respondent
THE MANAGER, NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court