Haridas v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed the Civil Revision Petition because the first petitioner had died and his legal heirs were not on record, stating the issue should be considered in a related petition.
What did the court decide?
The CRP is closed due to the demise of the first petitioner and non-appearance of his legal heirs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE TUESDAY, THE 19TH JUNE 2007 / 29TH JYAISHTA 1929 CRP.No. 964 of 2002() --------------------CC.855/2001 of TALUK LAND BOARD, KANAYANNUR ....................
REVN. PETITIONERS:
- HARIDAS, S/O.SREENIVASA SHETTY, VADAKKETHAMARAPARAMBU, FORT KOCHI.
- C.G.RAGHUNATH, S/O.GOVINDA RAO, CHITTEL HOUSE, MARADU VILLAGE. BY ADV. SRI.C.P.RAVIKUMAR SRI.M.R.SABU SRI.K.RAVIKUMAR SRI.V.J.JOHN
RESPONDENTS:
- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
- TALUK LAND BOARD, KANAYANNOOR, REPRESENTED BY CHAIRMAN.
- THE TAHSILDAR, KANAYANNOOR, ERNAKULAM.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
HARIDAS, S/O.SREENIVASA SHETTY
- petitioner
C.G.RAGHUNATH, S/O.GOVINDA RAO
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
TALUK LAND BOARD, KANAYANNOOR
- respondent
TAHSILDAR, KANAYANNOOR, ERNAKULAM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court