Y2RAYANAN v. Kalyani
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging an order dismissing an amendment application in a partition suit was dismissed. The Court held that the impugned order did not suffer from infirmity warranting correction under Article 227.
What did the court decide?
The Writ Petition was dismissed; no costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
MONDAY, THE 18TH JUNE 2007 / 28TH JYAISHTA 1929
WP(C).No. 500 of 2004(H)
-----------------------OS.313/2002 of M.C.,VADAKKANCHERRY ....................
PETITIONERS:
---------------------
1. NARAYANAN.
2. APPUKUTTAN.
3. KESAVAN.
4. SASIDHARAN.
5. LAKSHMI.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can exercise supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 to correct an order dismissing an amendment application in a partition suit.
Whether the dismissal of an amendment application creates such infirmity in a partition suit warranting correction by the High Court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
NARAYANAN AND OTHERS
- respondent
KALYANI
- respondent
PADMANABHAN
- respondent
SUBRAMANIAN
- respondent
CHANDRAN
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court