Dismissed
Gopalakrishna Shenoy v. Kalyanikutty Amma
Kerala HCCRP/901/2002
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN
TUESDAY, THE 6TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 15TH KARTHIKA 1929
CRP.No. 901 of 2002(D)
---------------------AA.135/2000 of APPELLATE AUTHORITY (LR), ALAPPUZHA OA.381/1985 of LAND TRIBUNAL, ERNAKULAM
REVN. PETITIONERS: RESPONDENTS 3 TO 5/ADDL. APPLICANT 3 TO 5:
BY ADV. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANT & RESPONDENTS 1,2 AND 6/APPLICANTS, ADDITIONAL APPLICANTS 2 AND 6 AND 2ND RESPONDENT :
BY ADV. SRI.P.R.JAYAKRISHNAN SRI.A.BIJU MANOHAR SRI.E.N.HARI SRI. P.B. KRISHNAN SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. R.BINDU
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
M.N.KRISHNAN, J.
C.R.P NO. 901 OF 2002
--------------------Dated this the 6th day of November, 2007
ORDER
It is submitted that since petitioner No.2 and respondent No.3
in the civil revision petition are dead and no steps have been taken
so far. Therefore, the civil revision petition is dismissed as abated.
M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE
vps
M.N.KRISHNAN, J.
C.R.P NO. 901 OF 2002
ORDER
6th day of November, 2007
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil revision petition should be dismissed as abated due to the death of certain parties.
Gopalakrishna Shenoy
Manohara Shenoy
Vijayalakshmi
Kallyanikutty Amma
Kesava Shenoy
Leela Bai
M.N. Krishnan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court