K.S.E.B, Rep by Its Secretary v. Aysha
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.KRISHNAN TUESDAY, THE 6TH NOVEMBER 2007 / 15TH KARTHIKA 1929 CRP.No. 416 of 2006() --------------------OPEL. NO 505/97 of I ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, ERNAKULAM ....................
REVN. PETITIONER: RESPONDENT:
KERALA STATE ELECTIRICITY BOARD, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADV. SRI.K.R.SADASIVAN NAIR
RESPONDENT: PETITIONER:
AYYSHA, D/O. MUSTHAFFA, PEECHAMPILLIL HOUSE, VAZHAKKALA VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK.
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/11/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
M.N.KRISHNAN, J.
C.M.Appln. No. 426 OF 2006 &
C.R.P NO. 416 OF 2006
--------------------Dated this the 6th day of November, 2007
ORDER
C.M.Appln. No. 426 OF 2006
There is no representation for the parties today also.
Application for condonation of delay is dismissed for default.
C.R.P NO. 416 OF 2006
Since delay condonation application is dismissed for default, civil revision petition is also dismissed for default.
M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE
vps
Kerala State Electricity Board
Ayysha
M.N. Krishnan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court