Y.Sadanandan v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The revision petition filed by the appellants/accused was dismissed as not pressed by their learned counsel during the admission hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
MONDAY, THE 9TH JULY 2007 / 18TH ASHADHA 1929
Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1997 of 2007(D)
------------------------------CRA.515/2003 of ADDL.SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC)III, TRIVANDRUM CC.186/1997 of JUDL. MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS COURT-III, TRIVANDRUM
REVN. PETITIONER: REVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANTS/ACCUSED 1 & 2
BY ADV. SRI.P.V.ANIL
RESPONDENTS: RESPONDENT/STATE
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09/07/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
Crl.R.P. No. 1997 OF 2007 D ````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Dated this the 9th day of July, 2007
O R D E R
The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that
he is not pressing the petition. Accordingly, this revision petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE)
aks
Y.Sadanandan
Sanishkumar @ LalU
State of Kerala
V.Ramkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court