Disposed
Jackson v. Haridas
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/1398/2006
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT :…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
FRIDAY, THE 16TH MARCH 2007 / 25TH PHALGUNA 1928
Con.Case(C).No. 1398 of 2006(S)
-------------------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN WPC.1672/2005 Dated 07/07/2005 ...............................................................
PETITIONER/PETITIONER'S SON IN W.P.(C): -------------------------------------------------------JACKSON, S/O.LATE T.G.JOSEPH, AGED 34, MANAGING PARTNER, NIRMALA PLASTIC INDUSTRIES, MUVATTUPUZHA.
BY ADV. SRI.C.P.SAJI SMT.P.DEEPTHI
RESPONDENTS: 3RD RESPONDENT IN W.P.(C):
------------------------------------------------------------
SRI.HARIDAS, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, CHIEF ENGINEER, KERALA STATE TRANSPORT PROJECT, MUTHOOT CHAMBER, THYCADU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY GOVT.PLEADER SMT.T.B.RAMANI
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/03/2007, ALONG WITH COC NO. 1393 OF 2006 COC NO. 1309 OF 2006 COC NO. 1279 OF 2006 THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE .J
C.O.C Nos. 1279, 1309, 1393 &1398 of 2006
-------------------------------------------------------------------Dated this the 16th day of March 2007
JUDGMENT
It is now clear that almost all the directions in my judgment have been complied with. Perhaps the petitioners have a grievance that the respondent was not justified in denying the benefit under the rehabilitation policy. Giving liberty to the petitioners to further proceed and impugn the orders passed in respect of the benefit of rehabilitation policy this Contempt of Court Cases are closed. The petitioners are permitted to agitate all their surviving grievances in appropriate fresh proceedings
PIUS.C.KURIAKOSE,JUDGE
es
JACKSON
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court