Ibrahim v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The Kerala High Court granted anticipatory bail to the second accused under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for offences under Sections 353 and 34 IPC, imposing standard conditions on a one-month bond.
What did the court decide?
Grant of anticipatory bail on bond for one month with conditions to report, face interrogation, and not influence witnesses.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
MONDAY, THE 15TH JANUARY 2007 / 25TH PAUSHA 1928
Bail Appl..No. 2 of 2007()
-------------------------Crime No.430/06 of Manjeshwar Police Station
: ACCUSED. NO.2. -------------------------------
IBRAHIM, S/O.MAMMOONHI, HASEENA BAUG MANZIL, CHIGNRPADA, KULOOR VILLAGE.
BY ADV. SRI.SUNNY MATHEW
RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT.
STATE OF KERALA THORUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANJESHWAR POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the accused in offences punishable under Section 353 read with Section 34 IPC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
IBRAHIM
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Coram
V. RAMKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court