Allowed

S. Santhosh @ Santhu v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC16 Jan 2007Bail Appl./128/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the High Court of Kerala allowed the petitioner to be released on bail effective 22.01.2007 in a rape case. Bail was granted subject to conditions including reporting before the Investigating Officer, availability for interrogation, and not interfering with witnesses or committing further offences.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail effective 22.01.2007 with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two solvent sureties each for Rs.10,000, subject to specific reporting and conduct conditions.

S. Santhosh @ Santhu Vs State of Kerala — Bail and Remand | Kerala HC (2007)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 16TH JANUARY 2007 / 26TH PAUSHA 1928 Bail Appl..No. 128 of 2007() ---------------------------CRIME NO.277/06 OF KASARGOD POLICE STATION. : PETITIONER --------------------------S.SANTHOSH @ SANTHU, AGED 20/06, S/O.KUTTY, NELKALA COLONY, KASABA VILLAGE, KASARAGOD.

¶3

BY ADV. SRI.T.B.SHAJIMON

¶4

RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT -----------------------THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KASARAGOD POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶5

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI P.N.SUKUMARAN

¶6

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16/01/2007, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶7

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶8

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

¶9

BAIL APPLICATION NO. 128 OF 2007

¶10

- - - - - - - - - ----------------------- - - - - - - DATED THIS THE 16^th DAY OF JANUARY, 2007

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

In this Petition filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the accused in Crime No.277/06 of Kasargod Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 376 I.P.C., seeks his enlargement on bail. The petitioner was arrested on 17.11.2006.

¶13

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶14

Having regard to the nature of the offences, the duration of judicial custody of the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with effe t from 22.1.2007. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail with effect from 22.1.2007 on his executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M.-I, Kasargod and subject to the following conditions:

¶15

The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

¶16

The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the Police, till the filing of the final report.

¶17

B.A.NO.128/07

¶18

Page numbers

¶19

The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution including the victim.

¶20

The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶21

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶22

This application is allowed as above.

¶23

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

¶24

dsn

S. Santhosh @ Santhu v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S. Santhosh @ Santhu v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ibrahim Vs State of Kerala

T.P.Mohammed Shameem Vs the State of Kerala

Anilkumar Vs State of Kerala

Anilkumar Vs Excise Inspector of Police

Sophy Korea Vs State of Kerala

Amshan Pillai Vs the State of Kerala