Shijeesh v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought anticipatory bail for offences under Sections 324 and 307 IPC. The court dismissed the application, directing the petitioner to surrender and seek regular bail within 10 days instead.
What did the court decide?
Discontinued anticipatory bail application; directed petitioner to surrender and seek regular bail within 10 days.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DECEMBER 2006 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA 1928
Bail Appl..No. 7246 of 2006() ----------------------------Crime No.492 of 2006 of Kuttiyadi Police Station
PETITIONER/ACCUSED ------------------------------------
SHIJEESH, S/O. SHANKARAN NAIR, MAMBALLY HOUSE, OORATH P.O., KUTTIYADY, KOZHIKODE DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.M.C.ANTONY
RESPONDENT: COMPLAINANT & STATE
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KUTTIYADY POLICE STATION THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI. P.N. SUKUMARAN
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in a case involving serious injury caused with a chopper and iron pipe.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shijeesh
- respondent
State of Kerala
Coram
V.Ramkumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court