Ramachandran v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
In Bail Application No. 7099 of 2006, the Hon'ble Court refused anticipatory bail to the first accused in Crime No. 228/2006 involving alleged cheating and forgery.
In Bail Application No. 7099 of 2006, the Hon'ble Court refused anticipatory bail to the first accused in Crime No. 228/2006 involving alleged cheating and forgery.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR
WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DECEMBER 2006 / 22ND AGRAHAYANA 1928
Bail Appl..No. 7099 of 2006() ----------------------------CRIME NO. 228/2006 OF FEROKE POLICE STATION
PETITIONER/ACCUSED
RAMACHANDRAN, S/O.MADHAVAN, PUNNATH EDASSERIKOLIL, KAKKOVU AMSOM AND DESOM, ERNAD TALUK.
BY ADV. SRI.SUNNY MATHEW
RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT
-----------------------STATE OF KERALA, THROUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, FEROKE POLICE STATION, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. JAI GEORGE
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11/12/2006, THE COURT ON 13-12-2006 PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bail Application No. 7099 of 2006**
*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated, this the 13th day of December 2006**
ORDER
The petitioner who is the first accused in Crime No. 228/2006 of Feroke Police Station for an offence punishable under Sec. 420 read with Sec. 34 I.P.C. seeks anticipatory bail.
B.A. No. 7099/06
-:2:-
agreement for sale in favour of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate concerned and files an application for regular bail within two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of, preferably, on the same date on which it is filed.
With the above observation, this application is dismissed.
Sd/-V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE)
ani.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the first accused in a cheque-relevant fraud investigation.
Ramachandran, S/O Madhavan
State of Kerala
V. Ramkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court