Dismissed

Abdul Azeez v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC7 Dec 2006Bail Appl./7169/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This short order dismisses a bail application filed by an accused in Crime No. 445/06 of Thoppumpady Police Station. The judge rejected bail, citing the preliminary stage of investigation, the nature of the offence involving flesh trade, and the likelihood of influencing witnesses and medling with the investigation. Offences charged include cheating, dishonest induction to serve abroad, and rape.

What did the court decide?

Bail application dismissed; no enlargement on bail granted.

Abdul Azeez Vs State of Kerala — Cheating and Forgery | Kerala HC (2006)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 7TH DECEMBER 2006 / 16TH AGRAHAYANA 1928

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 7169 of 2006()

¶6

----------------------------CRIME NO. 445/06 OF THOPPUMPADY POLICE STATION AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT/ORDER IN BA.6762/2006 ....................

¶7

PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶8

¶9

ABDUL AZEEZ, S/O.MUHAMMED, H.NO.13/50, PAPPANGA PARAMBU, PANAYAPPALLY, KOCHI-2.

¶10

BY ADV. SRI.S.NIRMAL KUMAR

¶11

RESPONDENTS: COMPLAINANT

¶12

¶13

S.I. OF POLICE, THOPPUMPADY POLICE STATION, THOPPUMPADY, KOCHI, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM.

¶14

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. JAI GEORGE

¶15

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 06/12/2006, THE COURT ON 7-12-2006 PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶17

*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Bail Application No. 7169 of 2006**

¶18

*** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dated, this the 7**^th day of December 2006

¶19

ORDER

¶20

Petitioner who is the accused in Crime No. 445/06 of Thoppumpady Police Station for offences punishable under Sections 420, 342 and 376 read with Sec. 34 I.P.C., seeks his enlargement on bail. He was arrested on 6-112006.

¶21

The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application. He made available to me the case diary files relating to the matter.

¶22

Under the guise of West Enterprises, the petitioner was acting as an agent for sending women abroad for eventual sexual exploitation. Several women who were ostensibly recruited and sent to Sharja were really cheated and were victims of the flesh trade. Investigation of the case is still at the preliminary stage. If at this stage of investigation, the petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution witnesses and meddle with the smooth investigation of the case. I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶23

This application is accordingly dismissed.

¶24

Sd/-V. RAMKUMAR, (JUDGE)

¶25

ani.

Abdul Azeez v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Abdul Azeez v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Rajeev Vs State of Kerala

M.Sankaran Vs State of Kerala

K.Abdul Latheef Vs State of Kerala

Ansari @ Athu Vs State of Kerala

Sreemurali Vs the State of Kerala

Prasad.v. Vs the State of Kerala & Another