Allowed

Thamarakshan v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC1 Dec 2006Bail Appl./6924/2006

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Kerala High Court granted bail to the petitioner, second accused in a case for possession of illicit arrack and distilling apparatus, under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The petitioner was ordered to execute a bond and comply with specific reporting and conduct conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on executing a bond for Rs. 20,000/- with two solvent sureties subject to specific reporting and conduct conditions.

Thamarakshan Vs State of Kerala — Narcotics (NDPS) | Kerala HC (2006)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT :

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMKUMAR

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 1ST DECEMBER 2006 / 10TH AGRAHAYANA 1928

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 6924 of 2006(Y) -----------------------------CMP.14845/2006 of J.M.F.C.,KARUNAGAPPALLY (Crime No.449/2006 of Oachira Police Station) ....................

¶6

PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED:

¶7

¶8

THAMARAKSHAN, S/O.KUNJU KUNJU, PUTHENTHARAYIL VEEDU, PRAYAR SOUTH MURI, CLAPPANA VILLAGE.

¶9

BY ADV. SRI.K.R.SUNIL

¶10

RESPONDENT:

¶11

¶12

THE S.I. OF POLICE, OACHIRA POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

¶13

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SHRI. P.N. SUKUMARAN

¶14

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01/12/2006, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶15

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

¶16

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

¶17

Bail Application NO.6924 of 2006

¶18

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

¶19

Dated this the 1^st day of December, 2006.

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

In this Petition filed under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C. the petitioner who is the second accused in Crime No.449 of 2006 of Oachira Police Station for offences punishable under Sec. 8(1) and (2) of the Abkari Act for having been found in possession of 11 liters of illicit arrack with distilling apparatus, seeks his enlargement on bail.

¶22

I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

¶23

Having regard to the nature of the offences, the duration of judicial custody of the petitioner and the other circumstances of the case etc., I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the J.F.C.M., Karunagapally and subject to the following conditions:

¶24

Petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

¶25

BA 6924/06

¶26

-: 2 :-

¶27

The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

¶28

The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

¶29

If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled.

¶30

This application is allowed as above.

¶31

V.RAMKUMAR,

¶32

JUDGE.

¶33

ess 1/12

Thamarakshan v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thamarakshan v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Mathew Vs State of Kerala and Another

Basheer Vs S.I.of Police, Atholi & Another

Saraswathy Amma Vs State of Kerala

G.P.Pravin Vs State of Kerala

Sathesan and Others Vs State of Kerala and Another

Suresh Kumar Vs State of Kerala