Disposed¶35

Omar Sheriff v. the Manager

Karnataka HC10 Jun 2026WP/19989/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karnataka High Court writ petition disposed as withdrawn by memo; petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India; grievance concerned non-implementation of One Time Settlement dated 16.11.2021 by Reserve Bank of India and L & T Finance Services; withdrawal on ground that matter has been settled; no merits adjudicated; bench: M.G.S. Kamal J.; decision dated 10 June 2026; GM-RES category.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed as withdrawn in terms of the withdrawal memo; no substantive relief granted and no opinion expressed on the merits. ¶35

Omar Sheriff Vs the Manager — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2026:KHC:27740 WP No. 19989 of 2022

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 19989 OF 2022 (GM-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

OMAR SHERIFF,

¶9

S/O SALEEM SHERIFF, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, NO.2718, AL - SAQIFAH, GEETHANJALI LAYOUT, HAL 3^RD STAGE,

¶10

BANGALORE - 560 075.

¶11

Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

SALEEM SHERIFF, S/O MOHAMMED LALGUDI JABBAR SHERIFF, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, NO.2718, AL - SAQIFAH, GEETHANJALI LAYOUT, HAL 3^RD STAGE, BANGALORE - 560 075.

¶13

…PETITIONERS

¶14

(BY SRI. ABHIMANYU ARJUN DEVAIAH T., ADVOCATE)

¶15

AND:

¶16

THE MANAGER,

¶17

RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, ST. MARTHA'S HOSPITAL, 10/3/8, NRUPATHUNGA RD., AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001.

¶18

¶19

NC: 2026:KHC:27740 WP No. 19989 of 2022

¶20

HC-KAR

¶21

L & T FINANCE SERVICES

¶22

UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 1981, HAVING ITS CORPORATE OFFICE AT SITE NO.92, 1^ST FLOOR, INDUSTRIAL LAYOUT, JNC RD., 5^TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 095. REPRESENTED BY SRIDHAR S MANAGER.

¶23

…RESPONDENTS

¶24

(BY SRI.ANUPARNA BORDOLOI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)

¶25

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) DIRECTION DECLARING THE ACTION OF RESPONDENTS OF NOT GIVING EFFECT TO ONE TIME SETTLEMENT DATED 16.11.2021 TO THE PETITIONER HEREIN IS HIGHLY ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL AND WITHOUT AUTHORITY OF LAW ANNEXUE-A AND ETC.,

¶26

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶27

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL

¶28

ORAL ORDER

¶29

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows:

¶30

¶31

NC: 2026:KHC:27740 WP No. 19989 of 2022

¶32

HC-KAR

¶33

" MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL

¶34

." The counsel for the Petitioner most humbly seeks the liberty of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the present petition as the matter has been settled. The memo may kindly be placed on record in the interest of justice and equity."

¶35

In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as

¶36

withdrawn .

¶37

Sd/(M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE

¶38

¶39

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3

Omar Sheriff v. the Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Omar Sheriff v. the Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri Pankaj Kumar Pandey I.A.S Vs Karnataka Information Commission

Mr Ibrahim Aliyabba Vs the Authorized Officer / Chief Manager

Sumanth K G Vs the Superintendent of Police

Smt. Sowmya Vs Assistant Commissioner

Mr. N. Theerthagiri Vs the Authorised Officer

Sri B P Vishwanath Vs the Secretary