Smt.G.S Prabhavathi v. Sri. Nagraj
Case brief
What is this about?
Karnataka High Court (Bengaluru), WP No. 7802 of 2023 (GM-FC), decided 23.02.2026 by Dr. Justice Chillakur Sumalatha. Amendment of pleadings — Order 6 Rule 17 CPC — application filed in 2023 in a 2016 nullity petition under Section 12(1)(a) of the Hindu Marriage Act alleging impotency ('quoad hanc') of the respondent — amendment refused because the plea of impotency and non-consummation was already pleaded at para 5 and no justifiable cause was shown for the delay — trial Court order upheld, writ petition dismissed. No precedents cited; no costs or amounts awarded.
What did the court decide?
The petitioner had already taken the plea of impotency in her pleadings; the Court recorded that at para 5 of her petition she had pleaded that the marriage had not been consummated owing to the respondent's impotency, so the amendment to add the 'quoad hanc' plea was unnecessary