Dismissed¶35

Rajesh v. Smt. Amrutha

Karnataka HC23 Feb 2026RPFC/147/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RPFC No. 147 of 2024; Rajesh v. Amrutha & Kumari Samyuktha R.; High Court of Karnataka, 23.02.2026; revision under Section 19(4) Family Court Act against order dated 16.04.2024 in Crl.Misc.No.591/2022 (III Additional Principal Family Judge, Mysuru) partly allowing maintenance under S.125 Cr.P.C.; dismissal for non-prosecution; no representation on 29.01.2026 and 13.02.2026; listed under caption 'for dismissal'; no adjudication on merits; no precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

The revision petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, there having been no representation on 29.01.2026 and 13.02.2026 and no readiness on the part of the petitioner to submit contentions even when listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. ¶35

Rajesh Vs Smt. Amrutha — Maintenance and Alimony | Karnataka HC (2026)

¶1

NC: 2026:KHC:11233 RPFC No. 147 of 2024

¶2

¶3

HC-KAR

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶5

DATED THIS THE 23^RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026

¶6

BEFORE

¶7

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 147 OF 2024

¶8

BETWEEN:

¶9

RAJESH S/O JAVAREGOWDA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 303, ODANADISAMSTHE ROAD, SRS, HOOTAGALLI, MYSURU CITY - 570 018.

¶10

…PETITIONER

¶11

(BY MS. KANAKA MAHALAKSHMI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. ABHISHEK K, ADVOCATE)

¶12

Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

AND:

¶14

SMT. AMRUTHA W/O RAJESH AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

¶15

KUMARISAMYUKTHA R.

¶16

D/O RAJESH AGED ABOUT 5.5 YEARS

¶17

2 - NC: 2026:KHC:11233 RPFC No. 147 of 2024

¶18

HC-KAR

¶19

SINCE PETITIONER NO.2 IS MINOR, REP. BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER PETITIONER NO.1

¶20

BOTH ARE RESIDING AT 168/2, CHAYASUTHA NILAYA, HUNDI BEEDHI, HINKAL, MYSURU - 570 018.

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SRI. ARPITH REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR MS. ANIKETHANA K.M, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2 MINOR REP. BY R1)

¶23

THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF FAMILY COURT ACT, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16.04.2024 PASSED IN CRL.MISC.NO.591/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL FAMILY JUDGE, MYSURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S.125 OF CR.P.C. FOR MAINTENANCE.

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA

¶26

3 - NC: 2026:KHC:11233 RPFC No. 147 of 2024

¶27

HC-KAR

¶28

ORAL ORDER

¶29

Ms. Kanaka Mahalakshmi representing Sri. Abhishek K., learned counsel on record for the petitioner seeks time.

¶30

On the other hand, Sri. Arpith Reddy representing Ms. Anikethana K. M., learned counsel on record for the respondents submits that petitioner is simply dragging on the matter and is not evincing any interest. Record discloses justification in the submission thus made. There was no representation on 29.01.2026 and on 13.02.2026. No reason afforded at least today as to why there was no representation on those dates. Even

¶31

on this day, petitioner is not ready to submit his contentions. Though the matter is listed on this day under the caption 'for dismissal', yet petitioner has not evinced interest.

¶32

¶33

NC: 2026:KHC:11233 RPFC No. 147 of 2024

¶34

HC-KAR

¶35

3. Therefore, the revision petition is dismissed for

¶36

non prosecution.

¶37

Sd/(DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE

¶38