Sri.Sataba Moloji Suryavanshi v. the State of Karnataka
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru (Division Bench); W.P. No. 4957 of 2026 (GM-MM_S); NC 2026:KHC:16040-DB; decided 18.03.2026; Vibhu Bakhru CJ and C.M. Poonacha J. Keywords: writ of mandamus; land conversion; deemed conversion Section 95(9) Karnataka Land Revenue Act 1964; fine amount Rule 107 / Section 107 Karnataka Land Revenue Rules 1966; Laterite extraction; safer zone declaration; Sy. No.157 Badas(inam) Village, Belagavi/Belgavi District; Swarna Aditya Gold Refinery and Resources Pvt. Ltd. power of attorney; State of Karnataka, Deputy Commissioner and Deputy Director (Mines and Geology); disposal on government undertaking to consider requests in accordance with law within eight weeks.
What did the court decide?
The petition was disposed of on the basis of the Additional Government Advocate's statement, to which the respondents were bound down, that the request made by the petitioners would be considered in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of the order.